|
Monday, 11 July 2011 00:00 |
CMAC has invited all filed candidates for San Francisco District Attorney (up for election this November) to participate in a special City Insider lunch, as well as complete a candidates questionnaire on the relationship between nightlife and law enforcement, public safety, and patron responsibility.
WHAT: CMAC’s special City Insider District Attorney Candidates’ Forum (Free for CMAC Members, $10 for non-members)
WHEN: Monday, July 25, 12:00p – 1:30p
WHERE: The Fillmore (1805 Geary Blvd., San Francisco)
Click here to RSVP on Facebook!
Submitted candidate questionnaires:
|
|
Wednesday, 22 June 2011 00:00 |
|
Friends:
Join us next Thursday (June 30, 7p @ Mezzanine) as we celebrate the California Music and Culture Association’s (CMAC) landmark one-year anniversary of ‘Empowering the Other 9 to 5′ through advocacy, education, and collaboration.
In addition to celebrating CMAC’s many legislative and movement building accomplishments, I am thrilled to announce the winners of CMAC’s first ever awards. Winners are honored for being solid stewards of the industry, for their innovative creativity, and steadfast advocacy.
Legacy: Lifetime Achievement – Warren Hellman It should be no surprise that Mr. Hellman is the recipient of our Legacy award. From opening iconic entertainment venue Slim’s to launching the Hardly Strictly Bluegrass Festival in Golden Gate Park, Warren’s contributions to the preservation and enrichment of San Francisco’s musical legacy are unparalleled.
Policy Maker of the Year – State Senator Mark Leno What can we say? We love Leno! He’s consistently been there for the nightlife community, seeking to bridge communication between entertainment leaders and the state Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) when regulation was overreaching. When the ABC was regulating infusions – like sangria – as illegal, Leno stepped in and introduced legislation (SB32) to ensure this type of misregulation will not persist. SB32 clarifies the legality of infusing alcoholic beverages with fruit, bitters, vegetables, and comparable food stuffs. This legislation has bipartisan support and is a significant step forward in updating antiquated language that is having unintended negative impacts on the entrepreneurial and culinary spirits that define California businesses. Cheers to Leno!
Best Venue of the Year – The Warfield Kudos to The Warfield! The Warfield defines San Francisco’s music scene. It has played host to everyone from The Clash, Grateful Dead and U2, to theatrical productions such as The Rocky Horror Picture Show and the Cantonese Opera from China. And, over the years, The Warfield continues to book the most coveted acts in show business. A combination of solid line-ups combined with impeccable business savvy, professional and effective security team, and community engagement and participation earns The Warfield our applause.
Best Event of the Year (over 5K capacity) – Sea of Dreams Talk about an event! The collaborative effort of AnonEvents, Sunset Promotions and An-Ten-Nae Presents produces a one of a kind New Years Eve event transforming the Concourse Center into a multi-stage, multi-environment fantasyland. Complete with lights shows, performance art, aerialists and more, Sea of Dreams takes the win. It is not easy to produce an event of this magnitude – crowd control, security and public health preparations, and satisfied patrons – let alone produce it collaboratively.
Best Event of the Year (under 5k capacity) – Streets of San Francisco Eye Heart SF’s “Streets of San Francisco” NYE is truly a world class event production. Taking place annually on the city’s waterfront inside the Fort Mason Center’s Festival Pavilion, the Eye Heart SF guys have made a name for themselves by consistently transforming this historic venue into an intimate cityscape inspired soiree emulating the landmark sights and sounds of San Francisco, all while providing guests with internationally renowned entertainment and first class service.
Congratulations to our winners, and see you all at CMAC’s One Year Anniversary Party: Celebrating the Other 9 to 5 (Mezzanine, Thursday, June 30th 2011, 7p to 9p, FREE ADMISSION, ages 21 and over)! RSVP and additional details on Facebook.
Sincerely,

Sean Manchester President, California Music and Culture Association |
|
Monday, 13 June 2011 00:00 |
|

|
|
Wednesday, 13 April 2011 00:00 |
|

|
|
Tuesday, 12 April 2011 00:00 |
San Francisco, CA (April 12, 2011) – In fall 2010, the San Francisco Police Department (SFPD) introduced additional security protocols for venues with an occupancy of 100 persons and more in an effort to help control and minimize nighttime violence. Currently, the Entertainment Commission – with feedback and involvement from law enforcement – issues heightened conditions on problem venues to either (1) modify their business plan; and/or (2) to bolster their security protocols. These measures are taken in addition to application of the Good Neighbor Policy, noise ordinance, loitering ordinance, smoking ordinance, and additional conditions incorporated into liquor licenses issued by the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control.
California Music and Culture Association (CMAC) shares the mission and desire of local law enforcement to increase public and patron safety in public places; however, we do feel the document as proposed would have little impact on the majority of violent crimes, which are primarily occurring in parking lots and other outdoor spaces. CMAC feels strongly that those individuals who disrupt our neighborhood fabric, and financially and physically harm the nightlife and entertainment community with their destructive behavior should be held accountable. Universally applying heightened and costly additional security measures on all venues without an authentic two-way dialogue with industry stakeholders will not be sustainable. Strong and effective security plans require complex and individualized programming. Unfortunately, there is not a ‘one size fits all’ model for all venues. Size, scope, business plan, and location are all factors that influence a well-managed venue’s security plan – and they may vary event by event.
- Areas where we agree: CMAC supports well-lit entryways to improve patron and public safety (on the condition that they are not disruptive for neighbors). We also believe that security personnel participate in the California Department of Consumer Affairs Guard Card program, that management be onsite during a Permit of Entertainment (POE) holder’s hours of operations, and that POE holders prominently post their local, state, and federal (where applicable) permits – including their legal occupancy, POE, and liquor license(s). (Access CMAC’s compliance cheat sheet here.) CMAC will continue to educate and engage venue management and staff on security and safety, and compliance with our city and industry partners.
- Areas of concern: Mandated security personnel ratios, metal detectors, and identification scanning and data storage first and foremost merit a thorough evaluation by the Office of the City Attorney. These measures are also unlikely to stop people that engage in criminal behavior in an alley or parking lot. Finally, while some of these security measures are currently in place for some venues and at some events, mandating that all venues apply the same enhanced security protocols are unnecessary (for example, at corporate events).
Good security plans require coordination between industry experts and law enforcement so that patrons and employees safety is considered once the patron leaves the venue’s security area and enters the public space – such as a parking lot or transportation embarkation points. CMAC encourages the San Francisco Entertainment Commission, SFPD, and third party experts to begin the process of collaboratively drafting a security best practices document for the Entertainment Commission through the creation of a task force comprised of two members of the Entertainment Commission, two CMAC industry/security representatives, and two member of the San Francisco Police Department. The task force’s charge would be to create a best practices document that takes into consideration existing good neighbor policies, newly proposed permit conditions, the larger question of a safe street scene, and also evaluate potential measures to hold instigators accountable.
|
|
|